Thus while many agreed that Hong Kong and Taiwan are a ‘community of shared destiny’, more seasoned politicians also recognised that given its nature the DPP would still keep a distance from Hong Kong and what happened there. For instance, a former Democratic Party leader complained about Tsai’s ‘lack of sincerity’ where he can’t see “the compassion in helping the young protestors”.
Since a lot of young protestors were forced to flee Hong Kong after the protests with Taiwan being a popular destination due to its geographical location, many were looking for the DPP government to do more to ensure a proper asylum system was in place in Taiwan. Issues such as formulating a Refugee Law has been a contentious issue and a dividing line among political circles on both sides before the elections. For instance a university student union president in Hong Kong spoke against the DPP’s policy as manipulating Hong Kong’s protestors, only to retract his statement a day later after being subjected to huge criticisms.
However, even a year after the election, despite a lot of warm words, concrete measures to support Hong Kong such as the Refugee Law has so far been absent from Tsai’s government. Proponents of the law such as the New Power Party argued that it would provide certainty and predictability to applicants facing political prosecutions who wish to relocate to Taiwan not just from Hong Kong but also other parts of the world. It would also provide the appropriate status for refugees to work, study and live in Taiwan. However the government has so far refused to work on such measures, arguing it would involve unnecessary sensitive constitutional issues of regarding Hong Kong as part of its territory that antagonises China. As one of the DPP interviewees told me, the government also has to balance it against the domestic impact on the likes of employment.
As a result, so far Hong Kong protestors could only rely on clause 18 of the regulations regarding Hong Kong affairs, which states “necessary assistance shall be provided to Hong Kong or Macau Residents whose safety and liberty are immediately threatened for political reasons.” Such a short clause has covered all the complexities young protestors faced that is treated on a case-by-case basis without any open and clear guidance. Despite setting up a special agency to handle these cases last July, a secretive environment remains in terms of the eligibility of clause 18 and the support given when arriving Taiwan.
Beyond helping vulnerable protestors, the DPP government seemed to have moved on from the Hong Kong issue apart from paying lip service from time to time when something big happened in Hong Kong such as the arrest of 47 pro-democracy figures in January. If Hong Kong and Taiwan are really a ‘community of shared destiny’, one would expect more from the Taiwanese government in supporting Hong Kong in concrete terms. However for the DPP it seems more important for Taiwan to be a member of the international community lobbying China than to commit to any measures that would aggravate the pressure in domestic society.
To conclude with the words a DPP figure in the interview I very much agree with: “Although I am very pleased and touched to see the friendliness and deep interactions between the people of Hong Kong and Taiwan, I feel incredibly anxious that such false fairy-tale will be exposed one day.”